Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Urganot central package version management option #20486

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: Urganot-central-package-version-management-option
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Urganot
Copy link

@Urganot Urganot commented Jan 16, 2025

PR checklist

  • Read the contribution guidelines.
  • Pull Request title clearly describes the work in the pull request and Pull Request description provides details about how to validate the work. Missing information here may result in delayed response from the community.
  • Run the following to build the project and update samples:
    ./mvnw clean package || exit
    ./bin/generate-samples.sh ./bin/configs/*.yaml || exit
    ./bin/utils/export_docs_generators.sh || exit
    
    (For Windows users, please run the script in Git BASH)
    Commit all changed files.
    This is important, as CI jobs will verify all generator outputs of your HEAD commit as it would merge with master.
    These must match the expectations made by your contribution.
    You may regenerate an individual generator by passing the relevant config(s) as an argument to the script, for example ./bin/generate-samples.sh bin/configs/java*.
    IMPORTANT: Do NOT purge/delete any folders/files (e.g. tests) when regenerating the samples as manually written tests may be removed.
  • File the PR against the correct branch: master (upcoming 7.x.0 minor release - breaking changes with fallbacks), 8.0.x (breaking changes without fallbacks)
  • If your PR is targeting a particular programming language, @mention the technical committee members, so they are more likely to review the pull request.

eafer and others added 7 commits January 6, 2025 10:53
* [C] Deprecate *_create() to avoid *_free() confusion

The behaviour of *_free() doesn't match *_create(), so the user should
avoid using them together. But they still need *_free() to clean up
library-allocated objects, so add a _library_owned flag to each struct
as an attempt to tell them apart. This isn't perfect though, because the
user may neglect to zero the field, but they would still see a warning
once in a while so it serves its purpose.

To prevent the new deprecation warnings (intended for the user) from
showing up during the library build itself, define a new family of
*_create_internal() functions, and turn *_create() into simple wrappers.

* Update samples

* add eafer to c technical committee

---------

Co-authored-by: William Cheng <[email protected]>
Manage colon converting to underscore on sanitize
* Adds @nullable annotation to Spring Boot generator

* issue-14427: [REQ][spring] Null-Safety annotations
* issue-17382: [REQ] spring generator add Nullable annotations

Motivations:
* Have Spring Boot generator client properly annotated for nullability to be able to check code using them with tools like NullAway
* As it is related to Spring then the `org.springframework.lang.Nullable` annotation was chosen to avoid discussion which `@Nullable` one is true one
* `@NonNull` wasn't used as I didn't see much benefit of it. Anyhow, an empty constructor and/or setters allow to put a `null` value there

Modifications:
* Adds nullableAnnotation template to handle nullability annotation on vars
* Adjust pojo templates to use the nullability template
* Adapts tests

Modifications:
* Runs export_docs_generator.sh script to update samples

* samples update

* excludes Spring @nullable from java-camel

* ones with defaults shouldn't be annotated as @nullable

* updates samples

* adds AllArgConstructor generation tests

* adds container tests
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants