We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RDF Concepts currently says:
"IRIs in the RDF abstract syntax MUST be resolved per [RFC3986]". There are IRI scheme-specific rules that should also be followed.
Examples of scheme-specific rules:
HTTP RFC 7230 -- non-empty authority (host), no default ports.
DIDs and URNs RFC 8141 each have a sub-grammar.
RFD Concepts can't enumerate all possible such rules but ti can mention they exists and like to HTTP/RFC7230.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
GH-135: Follow URI scheme rules
256d8dc
afs
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
RDF Concepts currently says:
"IRIs in the RDF abstract syntax MUST be resolved per [RFC3986]". There are IRI scheme-specific rules that should also be followed.
Examples of scheme-specific rules:
HTTP RFC 7230 -- non-empty authority (host), no default ports.
DIDs and URNs RFC 8141 each have a sub-grammar.
RFD Concepts can't enumerate all possible such rules but ti can mention they exists and like to HTTP/RFC7230.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: