Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider marking relationship annotation as experimental for 9.1 #7132

Open
JamesNK opened this issue Jan 16, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Consider marking relationship annotation as experimental for 9.1 #7132

JamesNK opened this issue Jan 16, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
area-app-model Issues pertaining to the APIs in Aspire.Hosting, e.g. DistributedApplication untriaged New issue has not been triaged

Comments

@JamesNK
Copy link
Member

JamesNK commented Jan 16, 2025

After 9.0 branched I added an annotations and methods for modeling relationships: #5311. These are intented for the resource graph UI. However they're already used for References and Back references in the dashboard UI today.

The resource graph UI isn't planned for 9.1 which is the main use case for relationships. I think we should consider marking relationships as an experimental API so we can change it if required when the graph ships.
@JamesNK JamesNK added area-app-model Issues pertaining to the APIs in Aspire.Hosting, e.g. DistributedApplication untriaged New issue has not been triaged labels Jan 16, 2025
@davidfowl
Copy link
Member

Can you include the apis you are considering?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
area-app-model Issues pertaining to the APIs in Aspire.Hosting, e.g. DistributedApplication untriaged New issue has not been triaged
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@davidfowl @JamesNK