You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We should decide what to do with this dependency. The major consumer of these packages is our templates in the ServiceDefaults project.
Should we upgrade to the new version even though we know it will "lift" Microsoft.Extensions.*, System.Diagnostics.DiagnosticsSource, • System.IO.Pipelines, System.Text.Encodings.Web, and System.Text.Json assemblies out of the shared framework?
Should we stay on the 1.9.0 version, and customers can update to the new versions if they want?
Should we split based on the TFM, and only use the new version if the app is targeting net9.0?
We haven't updated our dependeny on OpenTelemetry past
1.9.0
because1.10.0
introduces dependencies that "lift" assemblies out of the shared framework. See [bug] targets other than net9.0 shouldn't be forced to use 9.0 dependencies (open-telemetry/opentelemetry-dotnet#5973) for more information.We should decide what to do with this dependency. The major consumer of these packages is our templates in the ServiceDefaults project.
Should we upgrade to the new version even though we know it will "lift" Microsoft.Extensions.*, System.Diagnostics.DiagnosticsSource, • System.IO.Pipelines, System.Text.Encodings.Web, and System.Text.Json assemblies out of the shared framework?
Should we stay on the 1.9.0 version, and customers can update to the new versions if they want?
Should we split based on the TFM, and only use the new version if the app is targeting
net9.0
?cc @joperezr @DamianEdwards @samsp-msft
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: