Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for "Display Name" for endpoints in the Dashboard #7104

Open
eerhardt opened this issue Jan 14, 2025 · 5 comments
Open

Add support for "Display Name" for endpoints in the Dashboard #7104

eerhardt opened this issue Jan 14, 2025 · 5 comments

Comments

@eerhardt
Copy link
Member

With Add support for CosmosDB vnext-preview emulator (dotnet/aspire#7048), the Cosmos DB emulator resource has 2 endpoints:

  • The data "API" endpoint
  • A data explorer that allows developers to see what is stored in the emulator

The problem is you don't know which link is which:

Image

Instead of displaying just a URL, we should have support for giving a display name to an endpoint, and showing the display name in the Dashboard.

@leslierichardson95 leslierichardson95 added this to the Backlog milestone Jan 14, 2025
@davidfowl davidfowl added the untriaged New issue has not been triaged label Jan 16, 2025
@davidfowl davidfowl removed this from the Backlog milestone Jan 16, 2025
@davidfowl
Copy link
Member

@JamesNK @leslierichardson95 This is something I think we should add as a QOL improvement for these scenarios we want to enable where resources have dashboards shipped with them.

@JamesNK
Copy link
Member

JamesNK commented Jan 16, 2025

Makes sense.

You also probably want a way to control order so you force the most important URL to be first. I'm not sure what happens at the moment. The dashboard might display endpoints in the order they're received, or I might be sorting them based on the URL.

@davidfowl
Copy link
Member

Today the endpoint objects have name and url, this should be easy to add to the underlying model. We dint have a way to add arbitrary URLs in the resource model yet tho

@leslierichardson95
Copy link

Is this a feature we can do in 9.1? I agree that it would be QoL feature to have, assuming we're able to pull good url names/descriptions from the underlying model.

@davidfowl
Copy link
Member

We can try yeah.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants